![]() ![]() Even if the Senate voted to subpoena a witness who was in the White House on Jan. The problem for the managers is it's unclear whom they could call as a witness voluntarily who could speak to Trump's mindset. But that's only keeping open the possibility - it's not an indication on its own that the managers plan to do so. Trump adviser Jason Miller confirmed that Trump was rejecting the request, telling CNN, "The President will not testify in an unconstitutional proceeding."ĭuring his closing remarks last night, Raskin shared a series of questions that the impeachment lawyers would have asked Trump had he agreed to testify, including why Trump did not tell his supporters to stop the attack on the Capitol "as soon as he learned of it."Īt the request of the managers, there will be an option to hold a debate and vote on calling witnesses. "The use of our Constitution to bring a purported impeachment proceeding is much too serious to try to play these games," wrote Trump's attorneys Bruce Castor and David Schoen. In light of your disputing these factual allegations, I write to invite you to provide testimony under oath, either before or during the Senate impeachment trial, concerning your conduct on January 6, 2021." "You have thus attempted to put critical facts at issue notwithstanding the clear and overwhelming evidence of your constitutional offense. "Two days ago, you filed an Answer in which you denied many factual allegations set forth in the article of impeachment," Raskin, a Maryland Democrat, wrote. ![]() The national discussion about hacking during the 2016 election focused on the actual, confirmed hacking that targeted the Democrats’ computer systems. We can’t speak for every word uttered by every Democrat or every journalist since 2016, but it is clearly inaccurate to say that the entire party or entire media spent four years pushing such a claim. If van der Veen was suggesting that the “entire Democratic Party and national media” spent four years falsely alleging that hackers altered actual votes or vote totals in the 2016 election, that would not be true either. ![]() He claimed: “The entire Democratic Party and national news media spent the last four years repeating without any evidence that the 2016 election had been hacked.”įacts First: The Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign were indeed hacked during the 2016 election campaign this is a fact, not a claim made “without any evidence.” The US intelligence community, special counsel Robert Mueller and the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee all concluded that the Russian government was responsible for stealing and leaking internal documents and emails. Eventually the senators went in separate directions.įormer President Trump's lawyer Michael van der Veen claimed that Washington officials other than former President Trump are the ones who used reckless and inflammatory rhetoric. Several of the senators nodded in agreement and then asked questions of Cruz and Lee. Dan Sullivan, from Alaska, Mike Braun from Indiana, Todd Young also from Indiana, and Marsha Blackburn from Tennessee.Ĭruz, who was maskless during the conversation, could be heard saying, “The House has their standard of impeachment, but standard is different on this side.” After talking for a period of time, Cruz and Lee were joined by Sens. Ted Cruz, from Texas, and Mike Lee from Utah, who were seen entering a room with the Trump legal team last night, had an animated conversation during the break. Drew Angerer/Getty ImagesĪ group of key Republican senators, who have also been actively counseling the Trump legal team, huddled on the Senate floor during the break and could be heard talking about the “standard” of impeachment. Ted Cruz (R-TX) walk through the Senate subway on their way to the second day of former President Donald Trump's second impeachment trial at the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |